- ...
case-tagger.1
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: AND AS I DO (IF I DO IT) WITH ANAFOR.CG
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... adverb2
- Exceptions to the rule,
like 'the very man' and 'the then king of England' may be written
into the rule
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...p:top-dist.3
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: GET THE CODE UP TO
DATE
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... 'resultative'.4
- Objects are also mapped
to 'distance', which is the case-role I use for 'routes' (and not
'place', %TOP-PL, as suggested above). This is to handle the phrase
``gå den lige vej'' (litt: to go the straight path/way). As the
grammar is extended there will be a lot of specialised mappings like
this. The mapping rules assigning these will probably refer to very
specific contexts.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... exempt5
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: RIGHT WORD??
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
emphatic6
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: TERM??
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... lexicon.7
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: THIS IS A
VERY IMPORTANT DISCUSSION, BUT IT IS LATE, AND I STILL HAVE A LOT TO
WRITE.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... constructions.8
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: SOMEWHERE I NEED TO WRITE
SOMETHING ABOUT 'THE LIMITS OF CG' ESP. W.R.T. RELATIVE CLAUSES. E.G. ANAFOR.CG.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
case.9
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: EXPLAIN SELECT AND REMOVE SOMEWHERE TOGETHER WITH THE SYNTAX OF THE CG-RULES.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... subject.10
- Inverted subjects pose no problems, as
the relative clause do not come between the head of the subject and
the main verb in that construction. The same is the case for objects.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... clause.11
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS TO
THIS, WHERE YOU HAVE CONJOINED FINITE VERBS IN THE RELATIVE
CLAUSE. CAN THEY BE DEALT WITH?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... subject12
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: REMEMBER TO WRITE ABOUT THE CONSTRAINT GRAMMAR
NECESSITY OF ASSIGNING FUNCTIONS TO HEADS OF PHRASES, NOT TO PHRASES
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... below.13
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: THIS HAS BEEN CHANGED!!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
object.14
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: OR JUST A TRANSITIVE VERB
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... ``factitives'').15
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: THIS IS CHANGED
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
kilometer''.16
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: THIS HAS BEEN MOVED TO MAPPING
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... places.17
- PRELIMINARY NOTE: THIS HAS BEEN CHANGED, HASN'T IT,
OTHERWISE IT DESERVES A MORE THOROUGH DISCUSSION
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.